liability n. 1.責(zé)任,義務(wù)。 2.〔pl.〕 負(fù)債,債務(wù) (opp. assets). 3.傾向;易于…的傾向[性質(zhì)]。 4.不利條件。 hold no liability for damages 不負(fù)賠償責(zé)任。 limited [unlimited] liability 有限[無限]責(zé)任。 liability for military service 有服兵役義務(wù)。 assets and liabilities 資產(chǎn)與負(fù)債。 meet one's liabilities 償還債務(wù)。 liability to disease 弱不禁風(fēng)。 liability to error 容易犯錯誤。 Poor handwriting is a liability in getting a job. 拙劣的書法是求職的不利條件。
In the second place , the scope of liability for c 第三部分,對締約過失責(zé)任的研究。
Generally , different theories have different scope of liability , and ultimately affect the conviction and sentencing of the perpetrator , so , how 一般說來,不同之學(xué)說所歸結(jié)的責(zé)任范圍均有所不同,因而最終會影響到對行為人的定罪量刑。
Whether strict liability is excluded or reduced , and if so , to what extent , depends upon the weight of the external influence on the one hand and the scope of liability ( article 3 : 201 ) on the other 嚴(yán)格責(zé)任是否可被減免,以及可以減到何種程度,一方面取決于外部的影響的重要性,另一方面取決于責(zé)任的范圍(第3 : 201條) 。
By the analysis of the actors , infringing object , principles , the scope of liability , nature function and methods of damages , etc . , the thesis proposes the necessity of constructing and improving this system , and makes further discussion and argument 文章從行為主體、侵犯客體、歸責(zé)原則、責(zé)任范圍、賠償性質(zhì)、功能和賠償方式、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)等方面進(jìn)行分析,提出了完善、構(gòu)建這一制度的觀點(diǎn),并逐一進(jìn)行探討和論證。
The thesis begins with the key factor of delivery without the bill of lading , i . e . the bill of lading , gives an analysis of the nature of lading , then the nature , constitution and assumption of liability for delivery without the bill of lading , and discusses in detail the relationship between the form of such delivery and the assumption of liability and the relationship between scope of liability and limitation of liability per unit , with the aim of finding the countermeasures against such delivery and giving a comment on the several solutions 本文從無單放貨的關(guān)鍵要素? ?提單入手,分析提單的性質(zhì)與無單放貨法律責(zé)任的性質(zhì)、構(gòu)成及承擔(dān),并詳細(xì)分析了無單放貨的表現(xiàn)形式與法律責(zé)任承擔(dān)的關(guān)系、無單放貨法律責(zé)任的范圍與單位責(zé)任限制的關(guān)系,旨在尋求解決無單放貨的對策,并對諸多解決無單放貨問題的方案以評析。
The dissertation consists of such issues as summary of international carriage of passenger , scope of liability , limitation amount , compulsory limitation insurance and soon . the author ' s concentration on international carrier liability system is aiming to help to establish the new legal system in this field to which little attention has been paid 為此,作者建議就海上旅客人身傷亡的第三方責(zé)任對承運(yùn)人進(jìn)行強(qiáng)制保險并通過法律賦予受害旅客以第三人直接訴訟的權(quán)利,并重點(diǎn)分析和研究了其中蘊(yùn)涵的理論性和操作性問題。
This paper aims at studying the carrier ' s liability regime in the carriage of goods by waterway in china , elaborates the main contents of the carrier ' s liability regime including the period of responsibility , rules of liability , scope of liability , limitation of liability and non - contractual clai7m with the methods of comparative analysis , normative analysis , positive analysis and combining national law with international law 本文以我國水路貨物運(yùn)輸承運(yùn)人責(zé)任制度為研究對象,運(yùn)用比較分析的研究方法,并適當(dāng)采用規(guī)范分析、實證分析、國內(nèi)法與國際法相結(jié)合的論證方法,對承運(yùn)人責(zé)任制度的主要內(nèi)容,包括責(zé)任期間、歸責(zé)原則、賠償責(zé)任范圍、責(zé)任限制以及非合同之訴等問題進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)闡述。
Except for the contents indicated as the production of sahaja yoga hk , any other contents , including but not limited to the links in sahaja yoga hk and the information in " message board guest book " are not within our scope of liability , and therefore sahaja yoga hk is not liable to any compensations caused by accidents , such as infection by computer virus , defamation , infringement of copyrights or intellectual property rights 5 .除注明霎哈嘉瑜伽制作之內(nèi)容外,其他任何內(nèi)容,包括但不限于經(jīng)由霎哈嘉瑜伽網(wǎng)站連結(jié)的網(wǎng)頁留言版內(nèi)的資訊,霎哈嘉瑜伽一概不承擔(dān)賠償因意外包括感染電腦病毒誹謗侵犯版權(quán)或知識產(chǎn)權(quán)造成的損失。
The theory of indispensable condition can be the basis for the establishment of the causality in terms of causation in fact . meanwhile , the correspondence of causal relationship theory can be regarded as a principle for determining the causality both in terms of the scope of liability and the causation in law 為完善我國現(xiàn)代法治制度,我們應(yīng)借鑒國外“二分法”理論,以“必要條件說”確立責(zé)任成立的因果關(guān)系或事實上的因果關(guān)系,以相當(dāng)因果關(guān)系說等確立責(zé)任范圍的因果關(guān)系或法律上的因果關(guān)系。